The Cult of Impact

In Silicon Valley, “impact” is the highest word of praise. It signals power, reach, and moral seriousness. To chase impact is to prove you are not wasting your gifts. But when scale becomes the measure of worth, we quietly trade depth for breadth, and humanity begins to thin.

Not every large-scale success is hollow. Some innovations heal, connect, and make life more livable. But when we adopt venture metrics—user counts, growth curves, visibility—as our compass, we distort values. The yardstick itself bends us away from presence, humility, and the slow work of depth.

The Psychology of Scale

Sapolsky’s research shows how status hijacks our biology: dopamine spikes in anticipation, cortisol rises when rank is threatened. The pursuit of “bigger” is not just cultural; it is wired into our nervous system. Couple that with Yalom’s observation that much of striving is avoidance of mortality, and the chase for scale starts to look less like vision and more like flight—from finitude, from insignificance, from the vulnerability of smallness.

Impact, in this frame, becomes a shield. We imagine that numbers insulate us from loneliness or death. Yet no number restores intimacy, and no graph offers belonging.

The Cost of Impact Untethered

The cult of scale looks like:

  • Reach without resonance.
  • Success visible to all, but hollow to the self.
  • Connection replaced by metrics of “engagement.”

The cost is real: friendships thinned into networking, presence sacrificed to projection, and leaders who mistake visibility for voice.

Toward Grounded Leadership

Leadership grounded in humility looks different. It does not reject scale, but refuses to worship it. It values who is reached as much as how many. It asks not only whether growth is possible, but whether it is meaningful.

This requires rhythm, restraint, and empathy. A willingness to choose slow depth over rapid expansion. A trust that tending to a few with integrity can matter as much as broadcasting to millions.

The paradox is that the leaders who resist the cult of impact often create the deepest impact of all—not through sheer reach, but through resonance. They anchor their work in relationships, presence, and the unglamorous dailiness of care.

Conclusion

Scale is not the enemy. The danger is scale without soul. When ambition bends only toward numbers, it hollows the very meaning it promises to amplify.

The task is not to abandon impact, but to tether it—to empathy, humility, and presence. To remember that real change is not only measured in breadth, but in depth. That how we live with one another matters as much as what we build.

In the end, the most enduring impact comes not from conquering markets or maximizing reach, but from grounding ambition in connection. That is how leaders shape not only the world, but themselves.

You may also enjoy…